What would Clement do?

A Labour blog that witters on about Clement Attlee. Hurrah for The Major!

Archive for the tag “Ernest Bevin”

On snobbery and Shadow Cabinets…

The dust has settled and Ed has chosen his Shadow Team from those duly elected by the parliamentary Labour Party. Leaving aside the scandal of appointing Phil Woolas to any post apart from Minister for Oblivion, the biggest fuss in the chattering classes has been the appointment of Alan Johnson as Shadow Chancellor.

Now this is for several reasons, not least because Yvette Cooper was widely predicted to be a shoo-in for the post, but most of the carping seems to be along the lines that he is either too old or unqualified for the job. I have to say, as someone who is to the left of Johnson, this is bollocks, or if I think about it for a minute, utter bollocks.

Alan Johnson, an intelligent working class man who gave up a chance for higher education in order to support his family, knows more of budgeting than the wealthy son of an aristocrat. Unless you really want someone who has a family background in (legal, I’m sure) tax avoidance.

With an ageing population, do we really wish to make youth and inexperience the main qualifications for high office? Bear in mind that the youthful JFK passed risible amounts of Civil Rights and Social legislation compared to the older LBJ, who inherited Vietnam from his younger boss.

Winston Churchill would never have made PM if youth had been a factor (come to think of it, the Coalitions’ confidence motion rules would have kept Chamberlain in power too), and while we are on the subject, what “qualifications’ are we talking about here? Would it be a Ba Hons from just any University? Or just Oxbridge and The Russell Group (if they are well behaved)?

In his last revision of “Who Runs This Place”  the late Anthony Sampson described a country where political power is largely shared by a small elite in the name of Democracy, where most MPs have more in common with each other than with their constituents, and increasingly, as described in that other classic “The Rise of the Meritocracy”, these elites are self-justiyfing, to exclusion of the vast majority outside them. Evidently, if we are all middle-class now, some are more middle-class than others.

It comes as no surprise that the three most despised and lampooned PMs of the twentieth century fall outside this self-defined group – Macmillan (too posh and patrician), Callaghan (too common, no degree, loved the Labour Movement), and John Major (no degree, too common, nasal tone, flat vowels). When even the Tabloids are staffed by ex-Oxbridge types, this snobbery has become invidious. Compared to Baldwin, Chamberlain, Eden, Heath and Wilson, the record of these three is hardly worse, and in some cases better.

For the record, Oxbridge have given us The Cambridge Five, most of our PMs for the last century including Chamberlain, Baldwin and Eden, outstanding talents such as Gyles Brandreth, Oswald Moseley, Prince Charles (lucky us!), Thatcher, Lawson, Boris Johnson, Gideon “George” Osborne, David Cameron, Blair, Mandelson et al.

Those with no University Degree include Nye Bevan, Ernest Bevin, Morrison,  Manny Shinwell, Thomas Paine, Thomas Hardy, George Orwell, Jane Austen, William Blake, Jennie Lee and many others. Oh, and one Alan Johnson MP, a Labour MP who really has done a proper job.

The Strategic Defence Review…

“Leaving aside the admitted expense of it, I can say that the Nation cannot choose between having an Army and not…”

– or something like that, the Duke of Wellington, circa 1842.

Hard times beckon at the MoD, where there will be even less tough,tough toys for tough, tough boys.

The Strategic Defence Review, part of the regular business of Government, kicks off amidst an atmosphere of panic and demoralisation in the higher echelons of both the MoD and amongst service chiefs. After years of overstretch caused by too many operational commitments abroad, and a continuing procurement policy that fleeces the state whilst delivering few bangs per buck compared to other western countries.


And here is the problem, in an uncertain world, with new power blocks emerging, it is vital that our interests are safeguarded, and that international law is respected. We need forces that are well trained, well equipped and well led – not only for ourselves, but for the defence of Western Values in general. Those men and women need to believe that they will be looked after for putting their lives on the line. Already, front line helicopter numbers are set to be cut – at a time when such mobility is vital in Afghanistan.

In an increasingly unequal world, a GI-Bill style settlement for outgoing soldiers, airmen and sailors would be a vital step forwards. PFI has been a disgrace in MoD provision, and must be ended. We need to take a long hard look at priorities – we cannot uninvent the Nuclear bomb, but do we need Trident? Is it flexible enough? Can we defend these islands from threats? Or the Falklands? Are we kitted out for future threats most probable to occur?


Sadly Dr Fox(no, not that one), who may or may not still be at his desk today, is unlikely to look at cutting the long-term gordian knot of defence procurement. This review is most likely to leave all our conventional forces undermanned and under equipped for current operation, let alone any future entanglements. As the major Coalition partner is still profoundly Europhobic, we are unlikely to be furthering European Defence integration, whether via Nato or the EU – one policy that could very well reap definite dividends for not only the UK, but also France, Italy, Spain and Germany.

Once again, the Treasury will have its way, and we will be picking up the pieces for years to come. Not a solution that Major Attlee or Ernest Bevin would have welcomed…

Post Navigation

%d bloggers like this: